By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!Quote: "They really hoped almost to the last moment that they would force us to sign such an agreement so that we would take neutrality. It was the most important thing for them. They were prepared to end the war if we agreed to, – as Finland once did, – neutrality, and committed that we would not join NATO.
In fact, this was the key point. Everything else was simply rhetoric and political ‘seasoning’ about denazification, the Russian-speaking population and blah-blah-blah."
When asked why Ukraine did not agree to this point, Arakhamia replied that there was no confidence in the Russians, because they were ready to promise anything.
Quote: "First, in order to agree to this point, it is necessary to change the Constitution. Our path to NATO is written in the Constitution.
Secondly, there was no confidence in the Russians that they would do it. This could only be done if there were security guarantees. We could not sign something, step away, everyone would relax there, and then they would [invade] even more prepared – because they have, in fact, gone in unprepared for such a resistance. Therefore, we could only explore this route when there is absolute certainty that this will not happen again. There is no such certainty.
Moreover, when we returned from Istanbul, Boris Johnson came to Kyiv and said that we would not sign anything with them at all, and let's just fight."
Details: At the same time, Arakhamiia denied that the Ukrainian delegation was ready to sign such a document, and that Johnson forced Kyiv’s hand.
According to Arakhamiia, the delegation did not even have the legal right to sign anything – this could only theoretically happen at a meeting of Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Vladimir Putin.
Arakhamiia added that Western partners knew about the negotiations and saw drafts of documents, but did not attempt to make a decision for Ukraine, but rather gave advice.
"They actually advised us not to go into ephemeral security guarantees [with the Russians – ed.], which could not have been given at that time at all," said Arakhamiia, who headed the negotiating delegation.
In his opinion, the delegation achieved the priority tasks "by 8 points out of 10," because the Russians still "left" (retreated from Kyiv), and then everything turned into a purely military direction.
Arakhamiia admitted that there was a moment when he believed in the possibility of encirclement of the capital.
The new initiatives include utilizing private recruitment agencies for more targeted conscription and ensuring draftees are matched with roles that correspond to their skills, rather than being sent directly to the front lines.
“Some people are scared, scared to die, scared to shoot, but it doesn’t mean they can’t be involved in other activities…,” said Ukraine’s National Security and Defense Council (NSDC) secretary, Oleksiy Danilov.
“Now we have a new [Defense] minister with a new approach.”
Συνεκμεταλλευση και αναθεση σε αμερικανικες πολυεθνικες under construction
et voilà!
![]()
ΣÏνδιαÏείÏιÏη Ïε Îιγαίο και ÎναÏολική ÎεÏÏγειο με ÏÏογÏαÏή ÎÏÏιάκοÏ!
Î ÏÏμÏÏνία ÏÎ¿Ï Î¸Î± ÏÏογÏάÏοÏν ÎÏνÏογάν και ÎηÏÏοÏÎ¬ÎºÎ·Ï ÏεÏιοÏίζει Ïην ελληνική ÎÎΠδÏÏικά ÏÎ¿Ï 28Î¿Ï Î¼ÎµÏημβÏινοÏwww.newsbreak.gr
Θα μπορούσε να υπάρξει συνδιαχειριση και να επωφεληθούν τα μέγιστα και οι δύο λαοί.
Θα μας κάνουν Νορβηγία!
Οι ουκρανοί θα κάνανε ό,τι τούς έλεγαν οι αμερικάνοι. Δεν θα κάνανε πόλεμο χωρίς αυτούς, δεν θα κάνανε ειρήνη χωρίς αυτούς."δεν θα υπογράφαμε ούτως ή άλλως καμία συμφωνία με τους Ρώσους επειδή δεν τους εμπιστευόμασταν ότι θα την τηρήσουν".