Κυκλοφορία και στο PC για το Diablo Immortal

[nitro912gr]

τεσπα... για όλους έχει. Έχει και αλλού πορτοκαλιές.

 

[bald_killer]

So, you do have phones after all...

Spoiler

 

[Sugamoto Panagia]

Το survey το καλό λέει ότι μπορούμε να σας πάρουμε τα σωβρακα. Η Activision-blizzard σας ευχαριστεί και σας εύχεται καλό καλοκαίρι με πολλά mtx. Δώστε να πάμε διακοπές.

 

[Hellion]

RIFT SIMULATOR. Εξομοιωτής του πόσα λεφτά πρέπει να ξοδέψετε για να σας πέσει ένα 5/5 Legendary Gem στο Diablo Immortal.

$25 Rift Simulator

Gamble And Upgrade Diablo Immortal Legendary Gems for free

dimi777.github.io

 

[lelos kounelos]

$8 χιλιαρικα με την πρωτη φορα και το δευτερο το πηρα στα $13 χιλιαρικα .
Η δευτερη προσπαθεια πηγε καλυτερα αφου μου πηρε μολις $525 και το δευτερο το εδωσε με 5525$.

Τα αποτελεσματα αλλαζουν αλλα δεν υπαρχει φως με λιγοτερο απο μηνιατικο.

 

[Hellion]

Βασικά είναι τόσο εκπληκτικό αυτό το simulator που θα το ανεβάσω ως ξεχωριστό news item, μισό.

 

[Adhan]

 

[Hellion]

Να σημειωθεί πως με το σημερινό patch εισήγαγαν μεταξύ άλλων τη δυνατότητα για τους Free-to-Play παίκτες να κερδίζουν 2 Eternal Legendary Crests κάθε εβδομάδα.

Όχι πως αυτό θα βελτιώσει τις τύχες στο roll βέβαια, αλλά τουλάχιστον θα έχουμε κι εμείς το δικαίωμα στην αποτυχία.

 

[Great0ldOne]

Με πρόχειρους υπολογισμούς, αυτό αλλάζει το κόστος end game ντυσίματος ενός χαρακτήρα από το εξωφρενικό 500.000$ σε μόλις 837 χρόνια playtime. Να δεις που πάλι κάποιοι κλαψιάρηδες θα βρεθούν να γκρινιάξουν.

 

[Hellion]

Blizzard Revokes Third Party Diablo Immortal Orb Purchases, Leaving Players In Debt

Some whales stuck with $100,000 bills are just quitting the game instead.

www.thegamer.com

As noted by PCGamesN, Reddit threads have popped up warning players of what's happened with third-party Eternal Orb purchases. One such player, a high-level Wizard named Shia, received a -2,491,025 Orb debt that would have cost over $35,000 to repay.

AYYYLMAO

 

[nitro912gr]

Blizzard Revokes Third Party Diablo Immortal Orb Purchases, Leaving Players In Debt

Some whales stuck with $100,000 bills are just quitting the game instead.

www.thegamer.com

AYYYLMAO

τα κρατάνε τα λεφτά όμως στην bliz?

 

[Thaxll'ssillyia]

Diablo Immortal’s ‘misleading’ Blessing of the Worthy gem under legal scrutiny

The inquiry could lead into a potential class-action lawsuit

www.polygon.com

Lawyers from class action specialty firm Migliaccio & Rathod are looking for players who are upset about a particular Diablo Immortal item: the Blessing of the Worthy gem. The gem was available to purchase in the game, including in bundles that cost up to $100. Players found that the rare Legendary gem had some discrepancies in the wording of its description, rendering it less powerful than players originally thought.

Developer Blizzard Entertainment has since changed the text description for the item, making the damage scaling more clear. (It also handed out in-game gems to all players.) Blizzard hasn’t changed the functionality of the gem, however. The problem is that players bought the Blessing of the Worthy gem via those bundles, expecting that the gem’s effect would have a 20% chance to do damage worth 12% of a player’s maximum life — something the original description promised. But in actuality, it’s a 20% chance to do damage worth 12% of a player’s current life. If your current life is low, the gem won’t actually do much damage.

This might not have been a huge deal if the gem could be acquired for free, but players on social media have said they’ve bought the bundles, spending up to $100 and more for upgrades, specifically for the Blessing of the Worthy gem. Players have been clearly upset in forums and on social media, with some threatening a class action lawsuit due to the “misleading” text. Lawyers at Migliaccio & Rathod are apparently answering that call with an investigation into Diablo Immortal’s description of the gem, which it calls false advertising.

“This practice essentially amounts to a bait-and-switch, since a purchasable item was advertised with one effect that players wanted and ended up with something completely different,” lawyers said. Neither Blizzard Entertainment nor Migliaccio & Rathod have responded to Polygon’s request for comment.